So, today Dr. Drib deleted two photos someone else posted from a thread because they were greater than 600x600 pixels. As I wrote there:
Quote:
|
Why on earth do we have 1990s posting guidelines in 2017, Dr. Drib? Who did deleting Buran's pictures help? What good has been done here? How do we petition for a revision to the posting guidelines to reflect the fact that 600x600 is ridiculously small for a limit?
|
Dr. Drib said to take my concern to the Feedback forum, and so I am. Many of us want to see fine details of screen captures or other photos; when the average computer monitor screen is 1920x1080, and when most ebook readers can display at least 800x600 and often much more, this limit seems to me to be contrary to the purposes of this forum, arbitrary, imposed in a punitive fashion, and generally in nobody's interest. Can we get it changed? I 100% support JSWolf in this.