View Single Post
Old 11-04-2017, 03:38 PM   #161
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by sun surfer View Post
Right now, though, we're discussing whether listening to an audiobook is less active than reading a printed book. It's a similar subject but very distinct and perhaps even more to the heart of the discussion. Perhaps on this we'll also have to agree to disagree, as I see the view that it's less active to use one's ears to consume a book as subtly condescending especially to those who consume a majority of their books by audio, and even if those with that view also enjoy audiobooks.
I'm with Harry on the audiobook being less of an active experience, for the simple reason of tempo, when you are reading you can go at any pace you can handle, when you listen it's at the pace of the narrator.

Last edited by MikeB1972; 11-06-2017 at 05:20 AM. Reason: typo place -> pace
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote