Quote:
Originally Posted by mdp
EDIT: assuming this is the case, anybody who wanted access to that code, should probably introduce themselves as developers, explain where they would want to contribute, and actually contribute.
|
Sounds rather backwards to me as source code should be available without any prior conditions. So the very first step has to be taken on behalf of Onyx, not the other way round. Source code availability will also be a major sales argument for interested buyers.
Why even bother buying a device if source code availability is not already granted in advance? What attraction does a device have if there is no guarantee for it's prospective owner to enhance and adapt it's software according to his own needs, especially if the default software it is delivered with is still far from fulfilling it's expected potential?
Interested developers would hardly invest hundreds of dollars/euros/pounds into a device when it is already know in advance that it is closed hardware without access to the code. That would be tossing hard earned money into the wrong direction.
While being a Linux user since 1995, i am not a developer, but i still decide my hardware purchases based on compatibility with my chosen OS. Pure hardware capabilities are not enough, the ultimate deciding factor is source code availability.
My next e-ink reader purchase will be a 10.3" device and the decision is between the already available reMarkable and the upcoming Onyx Note. The deciding purchase factor will be source code availability, even if this would involve a higher price tag.
Providing source code will create a win/win situation for both seller and buyer, hands down.