Quote:
Originally Posted by MattW
The only "data" you provide is an article that is so polemic it borders on the ridiculous ("Lies, Damn Lies, and Book People Statistics" is the headline; how's that for unbiased reporting).
I love how some people think they somehow magically have the authority to just state something as a fact and that statement in itself is enough to end the discussion.
But what would I expect from someone who chose "the Great" as appropriate to describe himself?
[Is that too much? Am I at risk for being too uh, "direct" to an admin here?]
So, yes, I'll welcome a discussion about the substance but this "You're wrong because I say so, and I won't bother really engaging with the likes of you" innuendo doesn't give me a lot to work with.
Matt
|
Yes, that was a polemic; I was throwing caution to the wind that week and writing in a style that entertained me as much as informed the reader.
You're right, I'm not engaging well in this thread; my problem is that i m seeing the same nonsense arguments from two or three years ago, and i jut don't have the energy to repeat myself.
So I really should have dropped this discussion a while back.