View Single Post
Old 10-25-2017, 01:00 PM   #89
shalym
Wizard
shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.shalym ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
shalym's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,058
Karma: 54671821
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New England
Device: PW 1, 2, 3, Voyage, Oasis 2 & 3, Fires, Aura HD, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
Shari:

With all due respect--and without pointing this person out--there's a person that frequents these forums, all the time, who could not POSSIBLY pay that, to retain some relative's rights. His/her living situation is such that literally, pennies count. That's an American, living with some physical issues with a spouse with an emotional/mental challenge. That's just ONE person, from these forums.

How many others do you think there are, that are like that, in the USA? A country where we had some horrible number of people, a %, on foodstamps, not that long ago?

I can, easily, afford $20/year. But not everyone can, and I don't make the mistake of thinking that it's a pittance to everyone.

Moreover, just on principle, no, I don't agree that the heirs and devisees of an author should be OBLIGATED to make the book available during its copyright period. If they want to, great. But why should they pay for it, just to HAVE it? That's what you're saying--to keep what they've inherited, even if it's not earning a dime, they have to pay for it. Sorry, but...again, that feels awfully cavalier about someone else's property--intellectual or otherwise. And bear in mind--if that copyright is construed to have value, those selfsame heirs/devisees may WELL have paid the infamous Inheritance Tax on it, as well. In fact, probably did--so, now, the author paid taxes on any advance and any royalties, while he was alive; his heirs will (possibly) pay Inheritance tax on that self-same already-taxed money that they inherit, and now they're going to pay a tax--er, fee--to keep the copyright that is, under your scenario, NOT earning them any money?

Man. That just feels egregious to me. And the "publishing police" I mentioned earlier--who's doing that? You said, if they don't make the book available, they have to pay a fee. Who enforces that? Who assesses and collects it? That would be some type of enforcement arm--the publishing police, whatever you call them. Whoever they may be. So, back to my question--I get pissed off, as an heir, and I print, and "publish" 5 copies, to my relatives. Does that get me off the Fee hook?

The logistics of it are truly mind-numbing to think about. The IRS isn't already intrusive enough into our lives?


Hitch
Again...I never said that the heirs (or the author) had to make a work available. This whole idea is designed so that orphan works stop happening. You think that $20/year is too much? Fine. How about if they just have to fill out a renewal form every year to acknowledge that someone still cares about the work? Is that too much to ask as well?

Shari
shalym is offline   Reply With Quote