Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop
If I understood the article correctly, it essentially said "digital books enabled me to read a book that is otherwise too bulky and cumbersome in a paper format. It's just a shame the book wasn't in a paper format."
|
It's worse than that. He also wrote:
"Sometimes I still wish, I feel like, maybe there's something that will eventually emerge technologically that will give electronic books something closer to the wonderful, gorgeous ergonomics and haptics of paper books."
How can something "too bulky and cumbersome" have "wonderful, gorgeous ergonomics"?