Thread: Content Previewer typesetting vs mobi
View Single Post
Old 09-30-2017, 10:20 AM   #1
ntamas
Zealot
ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ntamas ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 106
Karma: 875040
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Hungary
Device: Kindle paperwhite 3 + Kindle keyboard
Question Previewer typesetting vs mobi
Hello!

When you would like to see how a document looks like on a Kindle ereader, you can use Kindle Previewer program and it can determine whether the document is suitable for enhanced typesetting or not.

As far as I know it is about hyphenation, kerning, ligatures etc..

AFAIK These characteristics are only available for azw3 and kfx.

So let's say the program says your document is suitable for enhanced typesetting, but then it offers only to save the document to .mobi or .azk. WHY?!
ntamas is offline   Reply With Quote