View Single Post
Old 09-19-2017, 09:32 AM   #9
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,659
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by darryl View Post
To us, perhaps. But according to this 2016 article.
I frankly don't believe the casually tossed out "30% of all sales" stat they're touting. Clearly define "all sales" and "some publishers" and I'll listen. *shrug*

The linked New Republic article also has a problem with tense. It should have been, "Book sales WERE driven by showrooming," not "Booksales are..." It's that exact kind of clinging to stale business paradigms by B&N management that has them on the ropes in the first place.

Not to say that Amazon won't cash in on B&N's failure ... why shouldn't they after all? I just believe that the current relevance/impact of B&N's B&M business is being overstated.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 09-19-2017 at 09:39 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote