Quote:
Originally Posted by vrf
Still, ethics conversations always intrigue me. By what standard is it wrong, in your eyes, to casually speculate about what lawyers and publishers might do with the manuscripts of a dead writer?
|
There's nothing at all wrong with abstract discussions of such issues. There's all the difference in the world, though, between an abstract discussion, and an accusation that a specific person has in fact committed such an act, when you have not a shred of evidence to support such an accusation. I'm sorry, but I think it's just plain wrong to do that.