View Single Post
Old 08-26-2017, 09:17 PM   #32
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,680
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
The other part is ensuring that the font selection doesn't abrade the eyes, or alienate the reader. After all, Doug, would you want to read a novel in Comic Sans? Papyrus? I suspect you'd notice that, right?
I'm assuming by your context that I'd probably notice, but ... case in point: besides hearing people complain about (or make fun of) Comic Sans, I have no idea what either of those fonts you mentioned looks like. I know a few names like "Times New Roman" or "Arial", but I'd be hard pressed to be able to pick them out of a lineup. That's what I mean by missing a gene.

Somehow, many readers became whiz-bang fontonologists after they embraced digital text. I never new I was supposed to care.

So like I said; unless they're utterly ridiculous--as I assume the fonts you mentioned must be, then I'm capable of adapting to pretty-much any reasonably legible font. The "wrong" body-font is typically just not a deal-breaker for me. *shrug*
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote