View Single Post
Old 08-18-2017, 05:25 PM   #184
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjaybe View Post
To return to the original question: would it be okay to condemn a book published by known hate-mongers without reading it? Particularly if other readers have confirmed that it's the same old story?
No. It wouldn't. Firstly, known hatemongers in one person's eyes are reasonable people in the eyes of others. Instead of "other" readers you probably should have said "people who have read it". And if you trust those people it is reasonable for you to choose not to read it yourself. It is not reasonable for you to simply jump on the bandwagon and condemn it unread.
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote