Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinisajoy
What exactly is the difference?
I don't see one. Just different wording.
Please tell me how should have never been published so no one could read it is any different from no one should read this book.
Looks like the same idea.
I am over 18. So I have a question.
Why should someone choose what I read?
Maybe I possibly find what the condemner reads offensive. What you read or don't read does not in any way affect my life. Now if one tells me I should only read what they read, that affects my life and personally what I choose to read is my business only not anyone else's.
To those that think they can tell people not to do something, how would you feel if you were told what you couldn't do?
See my thinking is you want to dictate to me, then that gives me the right to dictate to you.
|
And yet you think it's okay to tell people that they shouldn't condemn a book without reading it? How is that not dictating? They would have every right to tell you to butt out.-)
As for your first question: I explained that. See the second sentence of the comment you quoted.