Quote:
Originally Posted by arjaybe
Do you really see no difference between saying, "This book should never have been published," and, "Nobody should be able to read this book?" The first wishes the book wasn't available to read and the second says people shouldn't be allowed to read it.
|
What exactly is the difference?
I don't see one. Just different wording.
Please tell me how should have never been published so no one could read it is any different from no one should read this book.
Looks like the same idea.
I am over 18. So I have a question.
Why should someone choose what I read?
Maybe I possibly find what the condemner reads offensive. What you read or don't read does not in any way affect my life. Now if one tells me I should only read what they read, that affects my life and personally what I choose to read is my business only not anyone else's.
To those that think they can tell people not to do something, how would you feel if you were told what you couldn't do?
See my thinking is you want to dictate to me, then that gives me the right to dictate to you.