View Single Post
Old 08-12-2017, 04:51 PM   #159
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,082
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
But the $50,000 per title overhead is just that, a per title overhead, not a per book printed overhead. It represents the back office expense of keeping the doors open, not the actual expense of printing a specific number of books. You have the same overhead if you print 25,000 or 4,000. It pays for all the back office expenses require to run a large company.
Yes, overhead expenses are fixed. No, they are not $50,000 per title.

From the article: "At several publishing houses, they have a standard “overhead” charge of about $2 per book, or $50,000 per title."

The author of the article has the overhead right ("about $2 per book") but has then confused matters by adding "or $50,000 per title" without specifying whether that's a minimum or a maximim.

It clearly can't be a minimum. No publishing house could survive with a minimum overhead of $50,000 per title. It must be intended either as a maximum, or as the number from the example that follows.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote