View Single Post
Old 08-07-2017, 05:38 AM   #102
Question Mark
Wizard
Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Question Mark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Question Mark's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,419
Karma: 6513838
Join Date: Mar 2016
Device: More than I need, but not as many as I would like.
Perhaps the levels of brightness on my computer and tablets are set too high because they tend not to be very comfortable for extended periods of reading. I would never read with the light on my ereader set that high. Certainly, I can remember times reading a paperback in the direct sunlight and then being temporarily blinded when going inside or moving into the shade.

On a somewhat similar note to the question regarding eyestrain and LCD screens, I have heard quite a number of people claim that they do a better job at catching errors when proofreading when they are reading from a printed page than staring at a computer screen. I, for one, find that to be the case. But, I've never attempted to see how proofreading on an eteader compares to proofreading on a computer vs the printed page experience.

But, perhaps it has nothing to do with the screen and more to do with the elapsed time which comes from printing off what you have written as I can usually catch even more mistakes the further away in time I am from my initial draft.
Question Mark is offline   Reply With Quote