View Single Post
Old 08-04-2017, 03:57 PM   #22
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,206
Karma: 169936284
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Microfiche was not really portable. The film yes, but the readers of the film, nope. So if you wanted to read the microfiche, you'd have to tote around the reader and have access to a power outlet.
I remember Kodak service techs with a briefcase that contained a microfiche reader and microfiche library. They also carried what looked like a loupe married to a microfiche holder which allowed reading the microfiche without requiring an AC outlet. The microfiche were fun to read since they were written in Kodak's KISL which attempted to remove the ambiguity found in standard English -- all ~1100 words of it.

As for the title of this thread? I suspect that Amazon is in the same situation as Kleenex in English speaking countries -- a trademark is in danger of becoming a generic term. Considering what was done to Bayer after the first world war and their trademark on aspirin was stripped (along with their trademark on a cough suppressant called heroin), I find it hard to find much sympathy for Kleenex or Amazon.

Last edited by DNSB; 08-04-2017 at 04:06 PM.
DNSB is online now   Reply With Quote