View Single Post
Old 07-22-2017, 11:01 AM   #68
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,110
Karma: 234185759
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
Quote:
Originally Posted by latepaul View Post
Hmm, is that true?

I would expect MR mods to crack down on anyone linking to pirate sites. I would expect the general reception to a post "advocating piracy" to be frosty. I would not expect that it's completely off limits to discuss piracy, its motivation and morality, in a general sense. Such a discussion overlaps with a debate about the need for copyright reform for example. Something we've talked about on MR many times.

So maybe I'm wrong but I'd've thought it's acceptable to answer Mike's question.
The critical difference, as you noted, is between discussing piracy in the general sense and discussing it in the individual sense, where a person defends it, justifies it, uses morally loaded terms such as "fair" and so forth, or certainly admits to engaging in it. The first is permissible; the second, not. So Mike's question, addressed to an individual, can be answered, but only by a "No."

But discussions about why piracy exists, the motivations, the justifications, the success or otherwise in combating it, sure. Just don't take it to the individual or personal instance.
issybird is offline   Reply With Quote