View Single Post
Old 06-22-2017, 06:04 AM   #49
meeera
Grand Sorcerer
meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
meeera's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,837
Karma: 68407974
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
There is no generally accepted guideline. There is only various peoples personal preferences/prejudices. In quite a few of Heinlein's stories, the scientific/technical aspects are purely window dressing. In others, it's central to the story. Does that mean that only a few of Heinlein's stories count as "Real SF"? I certainly don't think so.
I'm not going to argue that "the science/engineering/SFnal setting is essential to the plot" is the definition of "real SF", but I could maybe make an argument that it's the definition of "hard SF". All the categories are extremely fuzzy-edged, however. Unlike some people who play with hard/soft SF definitions, however, I include social sciences in "science". Embassytown and Story of Your Life are hard SF, based in linguistics, for example.
meeera is offline   Reply With Quote