View Single Post
Old 06-10-2017, 10:50 AM   #49
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by jswinden View Post
if inheritance can be proved then the copyright protections should remain intact. I cannot imagine telling Lord Mucketymuck that he has to move out of the manor because the 70 year limit on retaining ownership of the manor has expired
Of course taxation achieves much the same ends. The entire value of an estate above a certain value is taxed at 40% in death duties, so every generation of Lord Mucketymuck's family has to find 40% of the estate value to pay in hard cash, or they will indeed have to move out of the manor! That's why the majority of Britain's "Stately Homes" are now owned by the National Trust, and not the original family who built them.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote