View Single Post
Old 05-12-2017, 05:38 PM   #2
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kadmos1 View Post
[SIZE="3"][SIZE="3"]Assistant Prof. of Law Evan C. Zoldan at the University of Toledo College of Law wrote a nearly 60-page research paper called "The Civil Ex Post Facto Clause" on 7/23/14 but revised it nearly 16 months later.

On its Social Science Research Network page, the Abstract says the following:


What are some web articles (up to 10 pages if printed out) that have evidence ex post facto also applies to civil? I eventually want to write to my local Congress rep that retroactive copyright extensions fall under this prohibition. I would have to include some evidence and opinion letters from legal experts that share such a view. When e-mailing that rep a link to a petition page that agrees ex post facto should include civil and that it should be brought up at a Congress meeting, I think it would need at least 100,000 signatures.
I don't know how many pages it is but Wikipedia has a long article about it. I've set the link to the part of the page that covers U.S. law.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote