View Single Post
Old 05-03-2017, 06:50 PM   #113
rkomar
Wizard
rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,058
Karma: 18821071
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury, ON, Canada
Device: PRS-505, PB 902, PRS-T1, PB 623, PB 840, PB 633
I have a PocketBook 623 (about 1024x768 screen resolution) and a PocketBook 840 (1600x1200 resolution), and although the latter has a slightly faster CPU and more RAM, the former renders PDF pages much faster. I put it down to the lower screen resolution. This is just a guess, but every PDF rendering software I've seen uses floating-point math for rendering, and the ARM-based ereaders have to emulate that part of it. The more pixels to render, the more emulated math to do. I think these devices would be faster at rendering PDFs if there was software that used fixed-point rather than floating-point math.
rkomar is offline   Reply With Quote