View Single Post
Old 04-15-2017, 11:14 PM   #30
davidfor
Grand Sorcerer
davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.davidfor ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 24,905
Karma: 47303824
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Device: Kobo:Touch,Glo, AuraH2O, GloHD,AuraONE, ClaraHD, Libra H2O; tolinoepos
Quote:
Originally Posted by koboy View Post
i did include sarcastic along with condescending and patronising in fact the exact order was (condescending,patronising,sarcastic) but you are right the first two showed very bad judgement on my part,which is why i deleted my response accordingly, i don't have any problem in admitting when i get something wrong which in this instance was the case.
You definitely DID NOT include sarcastic. The exact quote was:

Quote:
ever so slightly (condescending patronizing tone) that
No mention of sarcasm. If you want, I can post all of your original post. I kept a copy for exactly this reason. Or did I miss an edit where you added "sarcastic" before you decided to delete it altogether?
davidfor is offline   Reply With Quote