|
So what I'm hearing is that in ALL cases, a single opf dc language entry (representing the book's primary language) is what is guaranteed to work properly everywhere (which does not surprise me in the least).
What I'm not hearing, is why multiple dc language entries are being added to the opf in the first place. I see no advantage in doing so. In fact doing so can only cause problems--as this thread proves.
So where does the ill-advised practice of multiple opf dc language entries originate from? Anybody?
|