In Calif, Amazon was fighting because of the lawyers' "definition" of "presence. i.e. if a company or individual steers or refers a possible sale to Amazon, then would that be called a "presence" in the state? There is no real estate owned by Amazon. Also would a referrer being a "presence" by Amazon? The whole idea was more moneys for the lawyers.
Amazon struck a deal with Amazon to delay the taxing for a couple of years with the commitment of building distribution centers in Calif & employing thousands of workers to lower the unemployment rate.
|