View Single Post
Old 03-30-2017, 12:29 PM   #37
crane3
Guru
crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crane3 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 608
Karma: 5007204
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Calif
Device: Fire hdx 8.9, Tab S2, Tab S5e, Aura ONE
In Calif, Amazon was fighting because of the lawyers' "definition" of "presence. i.e. if a company or individual steers or refers a possible sale to Amazon, then would that be called a "presence" in the state? There is no real estate owned by Amazon. Also would a referrer being a "presence" by Amazon? The whole idea was more moneys for the lawyers.

Amazon struck a deal with Amazon to delay the taxing for a couple of years with the commitment of building distribution centers in Calif & employing thousands of workers to lower the unemployment rate.
crane3 is offline   Reply With Quote