Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf
I have read some reviews where it was said that the book was bought by mistake. So yes, it happens because of the too similar nature of the cover.
|
"In relevant numbers" was the question. I've read some "reviews" where lots of things were claimed. Doesn't mean I necessarily believe them. I have every reason to suspect that this particular brouhaha is a classic Tempest in a Teapot. Day/Tingle/Castalia House are looking for a some cheap publicity, and they're unfortunately getting it.
Has Scalzi publically chimed in on any of this yet? If I was a concerned Scalzi fan, that's who I'd probably take my cues from on this.