View Single Post
Old 03-18-2017, 04:09 AM   #7
chrisridd
Guru
chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chrisridd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
chrisridd's Avatar
 
Posts: 983
Karma: 2209358
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London, UK
Device: Kobo Aura, Kobo Aura ONE, PocketBook InkPad Color 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterT View Post
I believe the date you are referring to is a string that gets populated during the check​out of the source from a version control system. About all they could do would be to use a format that used month name as opposed to month number.
They shouldn't expose the git string directly in the UI. Their build system should insert the git revision information into internal variables so that the UI can then format them all correctly for the current locale. Format at runtime, not build time.
chrisridd is offline   Reply With Quote