Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
Those people are simply "not me." And they're free to continue being "not me" (with no interference from me trying to convince them that they'd be better off if they were, in fact, me).
|
Yet here you are in a poll thread, talking about it with the rest of us.
This is a discussion forum, not a congressional filibuster, and the only thing at stake is sharing opinions, thoughts and arguments (argument as in 'make a case for," not necisarrily "fight.")
HOWEVER, if an additional function of this community is to put the weight of consumer's opinions behind a message to providers and ask for some change, then it's not merely expressing an preference, it's a vote for or against the idea of spending resources on something, either "yes, I want Amazon spending time and money implementing this feature, yes I would appreciate and support app developers who put this feature in their readers," or "no, don't drive costs up with stuff that has no real value but to a tiny minority, and don't clutter up and complicate a good app by shoehorning in these features."
Point is, people's right to preference is not at issue, and really not worth mentioning, and your live-and-let-live attitude may be harming us all.
