View Single Post
Old 02-20-2017, 01:40 PM   #16
Cinisajoy
Just a Yellow Smiley.
Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Cinisajoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Cinisajoy's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
Quote:
Originally Posted by jswinden View Post
I have NOT studied the complete history of Arthur C. Clark, but I seriously doubt he engineered the ability to launch into orbit, maintain orbit, and synchronize a set of satellites at 30,000+ km above the earth. that would take a large operation of many engineers and scientists. It is very different to say one day we will be able to have geosynch satellites and describe the general concept, and quite another to actually make that happen. Today the courts are filled with patent infringement suits brought by people who 30 years ago drew out a concept in crayon that they thought might someday be possible. Those idiots had no clue about how to make that concept work. But because they dreamed about it and the US Patent Office was stupid enough to issue a patent on a dream, they often get large settlements. The guy who dreamed up the flying astro-car in a briefcase that George Jetson flew on his work commute was just dreaming. No one has ever built one yet, even half of a century later. But if they did build one would the credit for the invention of same go to the cartoonist or the actual inventor? IMO the credit should go to the actual inventor.
GeeCrow said the concept not the actual development. Big difference. It is entirely feasible that the future scientists read Arthur C Clarke and figured out a way to build on his concept.
Scientists have been reading science fiction since the genre first started. And the scientists in interviews usually give a nod to whichever writer influenced them.
Do not disregard science fiction. Might I recommend you read Jules Verne's In the Year 2889. Many of those ideas have come to pass.

Now as to the folding car, well a futuristic cartoon is not science fiction and it seems the biggest obstacle there would be the engine. But since they have now made a working engine from a 3D printer, it may only be a matter of time before we have box cars.
Though that one leads to the question, will people leave their cars unattended like they do their purses in stores?
Cinisajoy is offline   Reply With Quote