View Single Post
Old 02-05-2017, 03:02 PM   #84
ekbell
Guru
ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ekbell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 627
Karma: 12345678
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by shalym View Post
(emphasis mine)
Issybird, I'm sorry, and I don't want to make anyone think that I approve of copyright infringement, but there is a reason why it can't describe both. The reason is that words matter, and the definitions of words matter.

If you can find a definition in a recognized dictionary that allows the word "theft" to apply to intellectual property, I'll concede the point. I couldn't find one.

Shari
The dictionary readily available to me (Student's Oxford Canadian Dictionary 2nd edition) defines theft as 'the action or crime of stealing' and the first defination of steal as 'take illegally without right or permission'

Nothing in those definitions would keep illegal copying from being called theft unless someone was being very, very picky about the word 'take'
ekbell is offline   Reply With Quote