Quote:
Originally Posted by Katsunami
And I'm telling you that most speakers can't reproduce that benefit.
|
I disagree. Most speakers can reproduce that benefit.How well they do it deoends on the speakers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katsunami
If there was a clearly noticeable difference between 16/44.1 and anything higher, then Xiph.org, who are the maintainers of FLAC, wouldn't have posted a long article stating that anything above 16/44.1 is useless except for editing.
|
Actually, 24/96 is better for editing. That's why most digital recordings are recorded at 24/96.
Quote:
|
About 24/96, the article actually says:
|
That's pure BS. The audio beyond 20khz is not going to audibly hurt the sound you can hear. That article is a load of rubbish and really should go away. There are audible benefits to 24/96 over 16/44.1.