Thread: Death of copyright, film at 11?
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2009, 08:38 AM   #111
Trenien
Groupie
Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Trenien could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.
 
Trenien's Avatar
 
Posts: 173
Karma: 3277
Join Date: Jun 2007
Device: Librie, eReader, Kobo Glo
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
With the greatest respect, Ralph, you're on very shaky ground trying to use the ideas of 300 years ago to justify today's laws. For one thing, we live far longer: average life expectency in the early 18th century was under 40; today, in most western countries, it's in the mid 80s. For another, there were virtually no professional authors at that time; today, many people make a living writing, and by other "creative" activities. I can honestly see absolutely no rational justification for considering the "work" of writing a book to be trated differently from any other type of work, in terms of being able to pass on its benefits to one's family.
I call bs!
The average life expectancy of the time has nothing to do with that of people who wrote for a living. As they didn't toil in manual, low wages, labor, their life expectancies weren't that different to ours.
Trenien is offline   Reply With Quote