View Single Post
Old 01-19-2017, 03:17 PM   #23
GtrsRGr8
Grand Sorcerer
GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,334
Karma: 27815322
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southeastern U.S., ya'll
Device: Kindle; Kindle (10.1.1) for PC; Kindle Cloud Reader
A technical question, if I may impose on your time again.

Do you think that there will ever be a way to electronically improve the quality of, say, a 128 bit-rate audio to at least the semblance of a 256 bit-rate audio?

That may sound (no pun intended. ha) farfetched, but after all, digital remastering may have, too, say 30 years ago. Or, would creating the impression of a higher bit-rate involve a whole different set of, or level of, challenges than accomplishing things like digital remastering?

Last edited by GtrsRGr8; 01-19-2017 at 03:26 PM.
GtrsRGr8 is offline   Reply With Quote