Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
No. There are legitimate legal reasons to use the name of the company (EOS) that signed the original contract rather than the current company (HarperCollins).
|
What are these legitimate reasons? I cannot think of a single one. I can see EOS being used maybe if the book was put up while EOS was still in business. But after that, I see no reason at all to use EOS as EOS is no longer the publisher.
The way I see it, whoever put up these bogus versions went with the publisher listed in the pBook when the scans were done and did not know that EOS is no longer. That and they have no DRM when HarperCollins is not selling DRM free eBooks.