View Single Post
Old 01-14-2017, 09:13 PM   #4
cromag
Surfin the alpha waves ~~
cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
cromag's Avatar
 
Posts: 26,469
Karma: 459765791
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Device: Jetbook Lite & Mini, Nook STR, Kobo, Hanvon N516, Kindle 2, Androids
Back when I got my first MP3 player in 2002 memory was expensive. In order to make the most of the available space I ripped my CDs to MP3s at 128kbps. At that rate the song files were fairly small and sound quality was good, but I could hear the difference between the MP3 and the original CD.

These days space is less of a concern. I usually rip MP3s at a variable rate of around 256kbps. The song files are larger but the music quality is very, very good. I have a very difficult time telling the MP3 from the CD -- if I can do it at all.

I also rip CDs to an external drive. I rip to the uncompressed, lossless WAV format -- mostly because I always have, and WAV is still a little better supported than FLAC. FLAC files are smaller than WAV files, and both are lossless, but large capacity hard drives are much less expensive than they used to be.


I use Firefox and I'm interested in seeing how FLAC will be supported. I don't think it's going to make any difference to how I store music, but I'm assuming it will offer better quality streaming music -- at the cost of additional bandwidth.


BTW, just to keep this semi on topic, I also listen to spoken-word podcasts. For these, MP3s at 64kbps is more than "good enough." I assume that would also be the case for most audiobooks. So, if you listened to a streaming audiobook, FLAC would give a much higher quality sound, but I really think it would be overkill.

Last edited by cromag; 01-14-2017 at 09:24 PM.
cromag is offline   Reply With Quote