View Single Post
Old 12-28-2016, 11:49 AM   #492
notimp
Addict
notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.notimp ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 248
Karma: 892441
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: K2i
Or as tldr;

I am pulling the "don't push me around card" - and the moderater decides to push me around a little more.

Flawless victory, last time around -

This time, can I encourage everyone to give a big hand of applause - for ongoing attempts in bullying, sidetracking, taking over the intent of the thread, spinning the messaging, ...

(From my POV - the retraction that the comment about .kfx from the reverse engineer has to be seen only as an isolated comparison between two file formats - was just that.)


Oh - and give me a few minutes so I can read jhowells posting as well, because apparently it also makes some structural arguments about the file format, that should be worth considering.

edit: As a final aside - "publicaly agreeing with the moderator - just for the sake of doing so" also hasn't gone by unnoticed. (*cough* bullying *cough*).

Because - what does this mean? "I publicly agree with your point, that he should also censor his other post where he makes the same point?" ("There, teach - he missed one more! And you caught him!")
"I publicly agree with you point, that we have to see this in context with an entirely unrelated file format, that no one used - just so the "its not THAT bad" position gets more believeable"? (No, .kfx doesn't suddenly get less problematic, because somewhere also a .pdf equivalent exists.)

Last edited by notimp; 12-28-2016 at 12:15 PM.
notimp is offline   Reply With Quote