View Single Post
Old 02-06-2009, 04:37 PM   #551
ShortNCuddlyAm
WWHALD
ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShortNCuddlyAm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ShortNCuddlyAm's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,879
Karma: 337114
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mitcham, Surrey, UK
Device: iPad. Selling my silver 505 here
Quote:
Originally Posted by readerguy View Post
I have been reading a bit of this for some time and thought I would chime in. The hard core atheists in this forum are VERY good at taking a few typed words out of context and then twisting the words. It is just absolute ignorance and arrogance. You simply cannot have an intelligent debate with these people. It is a total waste of time. This is precisely why atheists have such a poor image in the society at large.

This is what happens to the arrogant apostles of Dawkins. They are exactly what they accuse religious people to be. Hypocrites who refuse to debate with reason, pulling things out of context and twisting facts to support their "faith" in atheism. They have ZERO answers themselves, yet are more than happy to attack people for their faith. Blind arrogance and making points by pulling things out of context does not make you right. It makes you ignorant.

I really didn't get it at first, but I can finally see the point of the original poster regarding this book being included on the reader because it is so offensive in attacking people for their faith. Dawkin's little disciples in this forum didn't like that, so they decided to attack the poster just as Dawkins himself would have.
Quote:
Originally Posted by readerguy View Post
Spoken with absolute class (even though I humbly disagree). It is just my opinion, but I just wish the atheists here were treating Theists with the same amount of respect you have so charitably expressed. Good for you.
Most of the people who've got involved in this, on any of the sides, have been treating each other with respect. We may not all have been agreeing with one another, but it's certainly not been a flame war or anything really beyond a bit of heated debate.

However, treating the atheists with the disrespect you have shown them in your first post may not be showing a good example...
ShortNCuddlyAm is offline