View Single Post
Old 12-27-2016, 09:15 AM   #26
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterT View Post
Here's a detailed look at the issue.

http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/...s-barnes-noble

More critically, it goes beyond the one malware package and implicates the chipset source. Specifically, MediaTek.

Given how common MediaTek is in low-cost Android hardware, their complicity is a red flag to consider. And avoid, if you're paranoid enough.

("Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.")

Edit:

Quote:

Even though Mediatek has a bad reputation for security, they still get a lot of design wins because they do all the heavy lifting for ODM partners that select their reference platforms. If you want to launch an Android device fast and not spend a lot of money, then Mediatek is often a viable solution.
https://hackernoon.com/no-one-cares-...6ad#.656je2quk

Last edited by fjtorres; 12-27-2016 at 09:22 AM.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote