View Single Post
Old 02-04-2009, 03:31 PM   #491
slayda
Retired & reading more!
slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slayda ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
slayda's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,764
Karma: 1884247
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Alabama, USA
Device: Kindle 1, iPad Air 2, iPhone 6S+, Kobo Aura One
Quote:
Originally Posted by NatCh View Post
Apropos of nothing but my own picking of nits (this is a hang up of mine, I can't help myself):

Inferring is what the listener/reader does.

Implying is what the speaker/writer does.


With my thanks for your patience, I now return you to your irregularly scheduled discussion.
NatCh, I agree completely with picking this nit but I wasn't sure whether I was reading the post a little wrongly or if the poster used the wrong term.

One of my favorite authors, Ed Howdershelt, uses "infer" both ways (i.e. to mean infer and also to mean imply) and it was driving me crazy so I looked it up & found that "infer" can be use (according to my college dictionary) to mean "imply". It still drives me crazy.

Along the same general lines, I wish we would invent the word "exply" to relate to explicit as imply does to implicit.

Last edited by slayda; 02-04-2009 at 03:34 PM.
slayda is offline