Thread: Why e-books?
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2016, 07:56 PM   #513
ratinox
Guru
ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 778
Karma: 11053908
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Mini
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop View Post
Stephen King and Arthur C. Clarke also had Stanley Kubrick turn their works into all-time classic movies. Why don't other authors follow that model?
So... what Charlie Stross stories did Kubrick turn into films?

But seriously, King and Clarke were well-known, successful authors before their stories were turned into films. Kubrick didn't make them famous; Kubrick adapted their stories because they were famous. This is true for most novels turned films. Hollywood studios tend to be unwilling to invest in unknown properties.

Quote:
Certain authors with a certain type of following are able to sell merchandise as a side business. That doesn't mean it will work as a dependable model for the bulk of authors.

I read all sorts of genre, niche and small press books. That doesn't mean I want to deck myself out in their t-shirts, hats and beach towels.
I know some people who would.

I also know a few who wouldn't, not because it's not their thing but because they think Stephen King and Clive Barker are too mainstream.

It takes all kinds .
ratinox is offline   Reply With Quote