View Single Post
Old 11-20-2016, 10:30 AM   #7
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,349
Karma: 234636059
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: Mini, H2O, Glo HD, Aura One, PW4, PW5
This was kind of a mixed bag for me. I ended up giving it three stars at Goodreads because I saw the appeal of it (I'll post about that later), but after a strong start, it didn't really fit my parameters of what I wanted.

The good: it was easy to listen to, even with the dreadful Hoopla app. I really enjoyed and was illuminated by the beginning. I know little of pre-history and I found it fascinating. But as the book progressed, it got increasingly squishy; much speculation based on little evidence, as far as I could tell, starting with identifying the hunter/gatherer stage as the lost golden age. Harari also tended to belabor his points (not always a bad thing in an audiobook, as I never felt I'd missed much when I zoned out!) and seemed to regard the reader as ignorant in every discipline. The discussion of currency is just one example. We get it. He also contradicted himself - as when he said there was no point to the French Revolution in terms of increasing happiness, which ignored his own comment on the broke mother who won a small lottery and experienced a permanent increase in well-being. Indeed. A mention of Maslow in the context of the French Revolution would not have been amiss.

Once Harari got to modern history, I thought he lost his mooring. I didn't think he had anything particularly penetrating to say; he used a very general history as the basis for his riffs on anything and everything and they did little for me. In the end, I didn't see the thrust of it all; admittedly it's hard to have a thrust when covering such vast territory. Mostly I was disappointed, as I'd expected history with mostly an anthropological bent, but Harari's multi-discipline approach obfuscated that aspect.

Still, as I said, I do get its appeal and I'll get to that.

Last edited by issybird; 11-20-2016 at 10:32 AM.
issybird is offline   Reply With Quote