View Single Post
Old 11-20-2016, 08:46 AM   #15
Dr. Drib
Grand Sorcerer
Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dr. Drib ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Dr. Drib's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,509
Karma: 60119087
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Peru
Device: KINDLE: Oasis 3, Scribe (1st), Matcha; KOBO: Libra 2, Libra Colour
That special Hugo Award was in 1966. The other top 4 finalists included this list:

Barsoom - Edgar Rice Burroughs
Future History series - Robert A Heinlein
Lensman series - Edward E. "Doc" Smith
Lord of the Rings - J.R.R. Tolkien


I find Asimov's 'Foundation' to be a wooden work of art - it doesn't quite come alive for me. It makes for quite a disjointed read.

I have fond memories of devouring Burroughs' works when I was a child. Today, they seem childish. Discovered at the right age, they can be fun reads.

Still interesting (for me) are Heinlein's writings - when he's not preaching.

Edward E. 'Doc' Smith's
writings are childish melodramas and great fun - if one is brain-dead and tone-deaf to the nuances of language.

Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" is the top winner for me: It still stands up as a great fantasy and as a great work of literature.

Last edited by Dr. Drib; 11-20-2016 at 08:56 AM.
Dr. Drib is offline   Reply With Quote