That special Hugo Award was in 1966. The other top 4 finalists included this list:
Barsoom - Edgar Rice Burroughs
Future History series - Robert A Heinlein
Lensman series - Edward E. "Doc" Smith
Lord of the Rings - J.R.R. Tolkien
I find Asimov's 'Foundation' to be a wooden work of art - it doesn't quite come alive for me. It makes for quite a disjointed read.
I have fond memories of devouring Burroughs' works when I was a child. Today, they seem childish. Discovered at the right age, they can be fun reads.
Still interesting (for me) are Heinlein's writings - when he's not preaching.
Edward E. 'Doc' Smith's writings are childish melodramas and great fun - if one is brain-dead and tone-deaf to the nuances of language.
Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings" is the top winner for me: It still stands up as a great fantasy and as a great work of literature.
Last edited by Dr. Drib; 11-20-2016 at 08:56 AM.
|