View Single Post
Old 11-18-2016, 07:37 PM   #574
GtrsRGr8
Grand Sorcerer
GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GtrsRGr8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,334
Karma: 27815322
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southeastern U.S., ya'll
Device: Kindle; Kindle (10.1.1) for PC; Kindle Cloud Reader
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinisajoy View Post
Or you learn how to cook meals for 2. Contrary to what cookbook authors would have you believe cooking for 2 is not hard and only on very rare occasions is there enough of the main dish for lunch the next day.
It is not hard to cook 2 steaks, 2 pork chops, 2 chicken breasts, etc. And just enough potatoes, pasta or rice for two. Again the key is bulk not box. And extra veggies never hurt anyone.

We buy in bulk and repackage. Again not that hard.
Want a cake, make it from scratch and one layer not 2.

Now where this goes wrong is on soups. Though soups freeze well.

Note I have been cooking for 2 long before cooking for 2 cookbooks got popular.
I think I will pass on this cookbook. Though yes, slow cookers are nice. On occasion, I use my west bend as a warmer. It works great if I have to keep dinner warm.
My main beef with slow cookers/crock pots is that with many dishes you have to add different ingredients at different times, so a slow cooker/crock pot does not offer any particular advantage, that I can see. Where a slow cooker is nice is when you use one of the very few recipes where you can throw everything into the cooker at one time, set the temperature, and go off and leave it for a few hours.

I never have done much cooking--I do none now--but one of my favorites was pot roast beef with potatoes, onions, and carrots. However, as far as I could figure out, you couldn't just throw all of them in together at one time and let 'em cook. The roast needed to cook a long time, so it went in first and cooked a good long while, then either or both carrots and onions went in after 3 or 4 hours, finally about 45 minutes before you were ready to eat you'd throw in the potatoes.

Oh, and to make pot roast, you are supposed to let it sear at a high heat on both sides for about 5 minutes, before adding water and covering it and turning the heat down low. I know that that is the correct way, because that's how Momma does it. I don't know of any slow cooker/crock pot that has the capability of searing meat at a high enough temperature. So, if you're going to use a pan/pot on the stove to do that, you might as well stay with that cooking utensil and just turn down the heat to take care of the whole job.
GtrsRGr8 is offline   Reply With Quote