View Single Post
Old 11-07-2016, 06:50 AM   #6
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyKate View Post
Has anyone ran across this before?

I was asked by a friend if I had read Last Chance to See (by Mark Carwardine). I had read the Ballantine Books version and said yes I had. (note: I edited to remove by Douglas Adams as I had mentally though that when she asked) [...]
I have a hardback copy of "Last Chance To See..." (published by William Heinemann Ltd in 1990). The cover says: Douglas Adams and Mark Carwardine. Inside the copyright notice says: Serious Productions Limited and Mark Carwardine 1990. (Serious Productions Limited appears to be a Douglas Adams entity, it's also used on my copy of "Mostly Harmless".) The dust jacket acknowledges both Adams and Carwardine as photographers.

... All that aside, I do think it is rather cheating to publish a subsequent book and deliberately make it look like it's the earlier one. But publishers tend not to be shy about that sort of thing. Come to that, neither is Stephen Fry.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote