Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
Kevin:
I'd really--truly--like to help, but the truth is, between my own time crunches and the fact that I don't use Sigil as extensively as I did, when I first came to MR, I'm not sure I'm up to speed on all the ins-outs. I spend 99% of my time answering emails, herding kittens, and trying out "new stuff" (like...working out new media queries for the guys, that kind of junk) nowadays. IF you (or anyone else here) has stuff you've drafted up, but just want polishing for, or details, or screenshots + polishing the writing, I'm happy to leap in with both feet. Can't say I'll be FAST, 'cuz timecrunches, but I will work on it.
Hitch
|
That's probably the same situation most of us are in. We use the corner(s) of Sigil, that suits our needs, but none of us use all and every function. (I myself usually feed Sigil with a near-perfect epub made by a notetab-clip and only uses Sigil to polish: TOC, splitting (notetab puts the splitmarks for me), footnotes, making the trial epub for the distributor and some final testing - nothing else - and I rarely encounter any of all those problems reported by other users, that use Sigil for all and everything and even something it's not meant to do).
Which leads me to think, that an epub manual might not be the best way to do it. Of course it's awesome to make the manual with Sigil itself - but some sort of "collaborative manual", if such and animal exists - a wiki-like thingie or something might be a better solution (which otoh also could end up in a mess without some coordination/moderation ...)
Well, just a thought.
Regards,
Kim