|
you raise an interesting point. these old pd books were written in a dramatically different social context and things which shock us were considered perfectly normal (the role of women, the attitude towards different races, etc. as you mention). i think that it is interesting and useful for us to read these books in keeping this perspective in mind, from a sociological point of view, to remember that society has evolved and see to see this evolution.
if you feel uncomfortable with some of these views (although, since you did not write them, you are not responsible for them) it might be a good idea to mention in your description of the book that they contain examples of some very outdated values which you do not endorse, and to keep that in mind while reading them.
however, i don't think there is any reason for you to feel uncomfortable (although if you find a really extreme example which you are too uncomfortable with, you can of course choose not to publish it) : i think it's very important for us to see examples of this precisely because it's important to remember how things used to be ; this can help us more clearly understand our current society and how we got here, and also help us to be more enlightened ourselves by being confronted with viewpoints which might make us uncomfortable in a contemporary setting. "he who does not remember history, is doomed to repeat it."
this is a very common dilemma and one i think it's good to be aware of ; the Tintin books are considered classic children's comic books today and they are really a treasure i think. however some of them present quite shockingly racist (by our standards today) stories and attitudes. when we read them, we should think "oh my, look how racist our society was at the time these were written ; look how we have changed our perspective since then," and even examine why people had these opinions at the time and how they shaped many historical events, rather than thinking "oh, Hergé thought africans were a bunch of monkeys, they must really be so."
|