View Single Post
Old 10-14-2016, 08:39 AM   #3
DrChiper
Bookish
DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DrChiper ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DrChiper's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,019
Karma: 2003162
Join Date: Jun 2011
Device: PC, t1, t2, t3, Clara BW, Clara HD, Libra 2, Libra Color, Nxtpaper 11
Yes, that makes sense.

I checked and all those ill behaving ones had the date 01-01-XXXX. Most of the times I do know the publishing year, but do not know the publishing month, so I enter Jan 1st as the date. When I make that Jan 2nd, every time the correct year is now used.

I agree, this behavior is apparently not new but must have lingered a long time and I did not noticed it

Thanks!
DrChiper is offline   Reply With Quote