View Single Post
Old 02-01-2009, 10:12 AM   #395
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,092
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
He would appear to be an ignostic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

It's amusing to see that those who do not believe in god(s) can split into almost as many sects as those who do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patricia View Post
A J Ayer discusses this in Chapter 6 of "Language, Truth and Logic."

1. Theists believe the proposition, "God exists" is true.
Ayer claims that "God exists" is strictly meaningless because it cannot be verified.

2. Atheists believe that the proposition, "God does not exist" is true.
Ayer claims that this too is meaningless because it cannot be verified.

3. Agnostics believe that one of the following propositions is true, but aren't sure which:
Either "God exists"
or "God does not exist."
Ayer says that as both propositions are unverifiable, this is not a sensible position to adopt.

Hence he declines to desribe himself as either a theist, atheist or agnostic, and suggests that the whole debate is meaningless. Scientists study verifiable phenomena.
pdurrant is offline