View Single Post
Old 10-07-2016, 02:24 AM   #19
Hitch
Bookmaker & Cat Slave
Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hitch ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Hitch's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,503
Karma: 158448243
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Device: K2, iPad, KFire, PPW, Voyage, NookColor. 2 Droid, Oasis, Boox Note2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doitsu View Post
Just a reminder, it's very easy to check all semantics entries by looking at the <guide> section in the content.opf file of epub2 books or the landmarks section in nav.xhtml file of epub3 books. Here are some typical examples:

ePub2 (content.opf)

Code:
  <guide>
    <reference type="cover" title="Cover" href="Text/cover.xhtml"/>
    <reference type="text" title="Start reading" href="Text/chapter1.xhtml"/>
    <reference type="toc" title="Table of Contents" href="Text/TOC.xhtml"/>
  </guide>
epub3 (nax.xhtml)

Code:
  <nav epub:type="landmarks" id="landmarks" hidden="">
    <h1>Landmarks</h1>
    <ol>
      <li>
        <a epub:type="cover" href="../Text/cover.xhtml">Cover</a>
      </li>
      <li>
        <a epub:type="bodymatter" href="../Text/chapter1.xhtml">Start reading</a>
      </li>
      <li>
        <a epub:type="toc" href="../Text/TOC.xhtml">Table of Contents</a>
      </li>
    </ol>
  </nav>
The cover image is tagged in the content.opf file in both versions as:

Code:
<meta name="cover" content="cover.jpg" />
I find this method much easier than hovering over each file with the mouse pointer.

Doits:

I love ya, but that is NOT the same as being able to instantly check the checkmark.

I will say that if the concept is that the () indicates that the semantic is set, perhaps it is just a matter of habituation. I'll also say that I wasted about 10 minutes the other day, screwing around with JUST this thing. I think that the Duck's suggestion, of some other indicator in the tooltip (bold, or..?) would be helpful.

It's not as quick/user-friendly, though, if you end up setting it because it's not there. The old method allowed you to invoke, check, back-out if unneeded, or click if needed. Very simple and clean. Yes, I know that your programmer's brain thinks that invoking=bad, but that's because you are only looking at it from the side of "already set, not needed." If you think about it from the side of the other 50%-100% of the times, it's right-click to invoke, visual check, click to set. See what I mean?

I think I can honestly say that I've NEVER checked the semantic meta using reports, and I, too, used the checkmark method forever.

Offered FWIW.

Hitch
Hitch is offline   Reply With Quote