Well, this is interesting! A rather-knowledgeable friend of mine on Facebook pointed this out to me. Here's what he wrote...
Worth taking a look at this court case (if you can manage with all the legalese). This is a UK case, but nevertheless it still provides some "precedent" with regard to a case similar to my own. Obviously it wouldn't apply to simply publishing a public domain work "as is," without making any emendations to it, but I can see my friend's point that this is rather similar to what I've been doing with my book.
Any thoughts?