View Single Post
Old 10-04-2016, 10:13 AM   #73
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Whether the state is "losing" hypothetical revenues is irrelevant.
It's not as if they *own* the residents and can charge for access to their pocketbooks, though many politicians in and out of Congress act as if they do and portray not-raising-taxes as "cutting taxes".
"Owning" residents isn't at all the same thing as ensuring that everyone pays fairly for sales tax. Getting back to the original topic of this thread, if a company can sell things more cheaply over the Internet simply because they don't have to charge sales tax, that gives them a commercial advantage over those who do have to charge tax. Business should be a level playing field, at least as far as taxation.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote